Nobody can explain so far the nature
of quantum fields as where do they originate and why are they omnipresent? The
list of those fields may include the Creation field (C-field) introduced by
Fred Hoyle, now losing its popularity and Higgs fields, the source of Higgs
particles that CERN scientists claimed to have discovered.
The Grand Relativity Theory that we
have been developing so far may answer such hard questions. Let us review a
little bit about it.
The central premise that the theory
hinges on is the union and nature of energy and spacetime. As we have
elaborated previously, the spacetime is not an independent entity but a mere
geometrical aspect of the energy. The number of spacetime's dimensions reflects
the energy's potency (degree of freedom). This energy-spacetime feature is not
uniquely limited to the conventional 4-dimensional but any higher dimensional
world.
The second premise that the theory
holds is the polarity of energy. At the cosmic scale, as this polarity starts
to manifest, the opposing energies viz. the positive and negative energies
split naturally creating a hyperinterface in between. The segregation of those
opposing energies does not take place at once but gradually. It makes the hypersurface expand as the
effect of the widening of the split area. In the human perspective, one
recognizes the broadening of the 3-hypersurface (3-space)recognised as the
expanding universe (Figure-1).
The interplay between the positive
and negative energies at the opposite sides of the interface gives rise to quantum
fields piercing through the 3-hypersurface igniting quantum-sparks
("quarks") on it like the sparked dots appearing and disappearing at
a TV screen. We perceive this individual quantum spark as a fundamental
particle, merely exists, perpetually appears and disappears behaving as though
it is both wave and particle (Figure-2).
In human perspective, these
generated quantum fields seemed as though they are coming from nowhere,
omnipresent, filling all of space throughout the entire universe (Figure-3). It
is the reason why physicists eventually come to the concept of fields which
capable of creating and annihilating particles through the introduction of what
so-called creation and annihilation operators in their relativist mathematical
quantum model.
Fred Hoyle in 1950s introduced the
Creation field popularly abbreviated as C-field to justify his theory on the
expanding quasi-steady
state cosmology. This C-field is capable to
perpetually create matter between galaxies over time, as such that despite
galaxies get further apart, new ones that develop between them fill the space
they leave.
He could not elaborate, however, as
to why and how the C-field came to be. Within the context of Grand Relativity
Theory, Hoyle's theory is right in some respects such that the number of
creative fields will increase with the expansion of the 3-hypersurface. As such,
the density of matters filling the expanding universe will remain constant
(steady-state).
However, to be more precise, Hoyle
should have introduced a more general creation and annihilation field instead
of C-field. Nature, through the polarity of energy, does not, at this very
moment, only create new matters in the expanding space between galaxies but
perpetually does create and annihilate all existing matter, every material
thing in the universe.
We can also explain Higgs fields
which can produce particles anywhere in space in a similar way. We can now at
least explain in a language of physics on how and why the Higgs fields, which
seemed like coming from nowhere, omnipresent, filling all of empty space
throughout the entire universe, do generate massive particles.
The Higgs boson which is
theoretically so heavy might be not an ordinary 3-dimensional particle. As it
penetrates the universe only at a tiny section of it (across the thickness of
the 3-hypersurface which is around 10-33 cm distance as depicted in
Figure-3), they might never be observed even in experiments performed at
ultra-high energy accelerators. CERN scientists claimed that they have
successfully discovered such particles in their Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Or
haven’t they?
No comments:
Post a Comment